WHITEPAPER
Creating accessible content is easy with the right authoring tool
June 11, 2024
CONTENT CREATED BY:

Table of contents
Creating a SCORM package compatible with any LMS involves properly structuring the content, defining completion criteria, and validating tracking before publishing. If you’re looking for how to create SCORM, you likely need to solve something very specific: turning a course into a package that your LMS accepts and that accurately records progress, score, and completion status.
This is where real issues usually appear: the course opens but doesn’t mark as completed, the LMS doesn’t recognize the package, tracking doesn’t work as expected, or you simply don’t know which tool to choose to do it without relying on programming.
In this guide, you’ll find exactly what you need to avoid those errors:
Additionally, we include a minimum structure template and a practical validation guide, because creating the file is only part of the process: what truly matters is that it works without issues in production.
Ultimately, if your goal is to publish training in your LMS with confidence, without rework and without relying on developers, this guide is designed exactly for that.
SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model) is an e-learning standard developed by ADL (Advanced Distributed Learning) that allows content to be imported into different LMS platforms and enables the LMS to track key learning data: status (completed/not completed), score, time, progress, and more.
In day-to-day operations, SCORM remains the most widely used format in corporate training because it solves one of the biggest challenges in corporate e-learning: cross-platform compatibility and reliable learning tracking.
Although alternatives such as xAPI exist, when the goal is to “upload it to the LMS and ensure it tracks properly,” SCORM is still the safest choice for most organizations.
A SCORM file is not “a course.” It’s a .zip file with a specific structure. Inside, you’ll typically find HTML, CSS, JavaScript, multimedia assets, and one essential file: imsmanifest.xml. This manifest file tells the LMS what’s inside the package, how it’s structured, and which resource should be launched.
If the manifest is incorrect, the LMS may:
The real challenge isn’t understanding what SCORM is—it’s ensuring that the package works correctly in the LMS.
To create SCORM correctly, generating a .zip file is not enough. That file must follow a specific structure and meet technical requirements so the LMS can interpret it and track learner activity.
A SCORM package is essentially a structured and compressed set of files that includes everything needed to run an e-learning course and communicate with the platform. It’s not just visual content—it also contains technical instructions that enable learning tracking.
When you export a course as SCORM, it typically includes:
If any of these components are misconfigured—especially the manifest file or the API communication—the course may open but fail to track learner activity properly. That’s where most issues arise.
Within a SCORM package, there are two types of resources: ASSET and SCO (Sharable Content Object). Understanding the difference is not just technical—it directly impacts how the LMS tracks learner activity.
An ASSET is a static resource.
A SCO is a trackable unit that communicates with the LMS.
The right choice depends on what you need to measure.
| If you need… | Use ASSET | Use SCO |
|---|---|---|
| Display information without recording progress | ✔ | |
| Include a PDF, video, or downloadable resource | ✔ | |
| Record that the student has completed a module | ✔ | |
| To measure a test score or result | ✔ | |
| Control navigation or progress by section | ✔ | |
| Crear una unidad independiente dentro del curso | ✔ |
If the content only needs to be viewed, it’s an ASSET. If the content needs to send data to the LMS (completion, score, time), it must be a SCO.
For example, in a course with four assessable modules, it’s common for each module to be an independent SCO. In contrast, an image or supporting document within that module would be an ASSET.
Making the right decision when structuring your SCORM package helps prevent future tracking and reporting issues in the LMS.
Imagine you’re designing a course on Power Skills. You would start by defining the course units, such as:
In SCORM terms, this content translates into 4 SCOs, one for each course unit:
Within each unit, you may also include additional sub-units or structured learning elements, depending on the instructional design of each module.
When a SCORM package doesn’t properly track progress or completion, the question is always the same: is the issue in the content or in the LMS configuration?
Before rebuilding the course or changing settings blindly, the most effective approach is to use a validated minimum SCORM package as a control test. This type of template includes only the essentials required for LMS communication: a functional basic structure, a properly configured imsmanifest.xml file, and a simple completion event that sends data to the system.
What is it actually for? To isolate the source of the problem.
If this minimum SCORM package works in your LMS and correctly records completion status, the issue lies in your original package (structure, completion criteria, or tracking configuration).
If it doesn’t work either, the issue is most likely in the LMS configuration.
It’s not a replacement for an authoring tool or a production solution. It’s a diagnostic resource that helps you identify the root cause without wasting hours on unfocused testing.
If you’re creating simple, one-off content, you can rely on quick conversions (for example, from PowerPoint), as long as the course is linear and doesn’t require much interactivity. It’s a valid solution when you need speed and the tracking requirements are not complex.
If you’re producing training regularly, managing multiple courses, or need visual consistency, collaboration, and fewer technical issues, the standard approach is to use an authoring tool that exports stable, LMS-compatible SCORM packages.
Manually creating SCORM is also possible, but it involves building the manifest, integrating the SCORM API, properly defining tracking events, and testing each package before publishing. In practice, it only makes sense if you have a technical team and a very specific use case that cannot be solved with standard tools.
Practical conclusion: if your priority is full control and you have technical expertise, manual development may be appropriate. If your priority is efficiency, stability, and reducing production errors, an authoring tool is usually the safest and most scalable option.
A common mistake is designing “a nice-looking presentation” and then exporting it as SCORM, assuming everything will track automatically. For SCORM to track correctly, you need to define what “completed” means and where that condition is triggered: at the end of the course, after passing a test, after viewing a certain number of screens, and so on.
This is where authoring tools typically save significant time, since they already include built-in navigation logic, assessments, and configurable completion criteria—without requiring any coding.
This is the step most people skip—and the one that prevents the most issues. Before uploading your package to the “real” LMS, validate it in a neutral environment. For that purpose, SCORM Cloud is the de facto standard for independently testing SCORM packages.
If you’re not sure where to start when choosing your authoring tool, take a look at our Whitepaper: Step by step guide to choosing your perfect authoring tool.
Choosing the right software is key if you want to save time and avoid compatibility issues. However, there are many types of SCORM authoring tools on the market. Here are two main categories you can explore:
Free options can be a good fit when you need to run quick tests or validate a workflow, when you’re creating simple, one-off content, or when you don’t require advanced design or high levels of interactivity. That said, it’s important to keep in mind that they often come with common limitations, such as reduced customization, partial exports or fewer export options, a less optimized user experience, and limited scalability as the number of courses or content complexity grows.
If your company creates training on a recurring basis, a paid tool typically pays for itself through time savings in design and production, fewer issues during publishing and maintenance, visual consistency across courses and teams, and improved results thanks to more refined learning experiences (higher engagement and better completion rates).
In addition, paid tools usually provide ongoing support and regular updates—essential when you need long-term stability and compatibility with your LMS.
Features
Advantages
Pricing
Features
Advantages
Pricing
Features
Benefits
Pricing
Features
Benefits
Pricing
Features
Benefits
Pricing
Features
Benefits
Pricing
Features
Benefits
Pricing
Features
Benefits
Pricing
Before uploading your package to your final LMS, it’s recommended to validate it in a neutral environment such as SCORM Cloud. This tool allows you to check whether the file is properly communicating with the SCORM API and whether it’s sending the data you actually need to measure.
When running the test, it’s not enough for the course to simply “open.” The key is to verify three critical elements:
The basic validation flow would be:
If the course correctly records completion and score in SCORM Cloud but not in your LMS, the issue is likely in the LMS configuration (completion criteria, tracking mode, etc.).
If it also fails to record correctly in SCORM Cloud, the issue is in your SCORM package (manifest file, tracking events, or export settings).
This preliminary validation can save you hours of trial and error and help you avoid issues when publishing to production.
Before exporting your course, you need to make a key decision: which SCORM version to use. SCORM 1.2 and SCORM 2004 share the same overall purpose (interoperability + tracking), but they have important differences.
| Criterion | SCORM 1.2 | SCORM 2004 |
|---|---|---|
| LMS compatibility | ✅ Very high (the most universal) | ✅ High (but not always perfect) |
| Stability | ✅ Muy estable | ✅ Estable |
| Tracking estándar | ✅ Progress, completed, score | ✅ Similar, with more control |
| Secuenciación avanzada | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (more likely) |
| Navigation / rules between modules | Standard | More advanced |
| General recommendation | ✅ “May it always work” | ✅ If you need advanced rules |
Practical recommendation for 2026: in most corporate environments, SCORM 1.2 remains the safest choice, especially for compliance training.
After hearing all these technical terms, creating a SCORM package may sound more complex than it actually is. In reality, it largely depends on the method and tool you use to develop your e-learning content. Here are four ways to create SCORM for free without needing to code:
Converting PowerPoint to SCORM is one of the most common ways to create a SCORM package without programming—especially when you already have training materials developed.
To do it properly, you need an authoring tool that allows you to import PPT files and export them as SCORM 1.2 or SCORM 2004.
The typical process is:
The second way to create SCORM is through manual programming. This is a more complex process than the previous options. It involves developing the training content using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, creating the manifest file that defines the course structure and included resources, integrating the SCORM API into your content so it can communicate with the LMS, and writing the necessary JavaScript code to initialize tracking, monitor progress, and properly close the learning session.
You’ll then need to package the content by organizing all course files (HTML, CSS, JavaScript, imsmanifest.xml) into the correct folder structure, compress them into a ZIP package, and upload it to your LMS.
There are resources that can help you create SCORM without using an authoring tool, such as SCORM converters, SCORM packagers, and SCORM players or testers. Converters transform documents like PDFs and PPTs into interactive SCORM modules. Packagers are used by developers to make HTML content SCORM-compliant by adding SCORM API commands. SCORM players or testers are useful for reviewing and ensuring that a SCORM file is error-free before distributing it in your LMS. These resources can be useful for those who prefer not to invest in new technologies.
Creating SCORM in isEazy Author is very simple. You only need to:
You also have the option to import your PowerPoint and create a new project, allowing you to reuse all the content you already have.
With isEazy Author, you can also turn AI into your main ally when creating SCORM content. With the new AI Autopilot feature, creating SCORM becomes remarkably simple.
Start with an idea or upload your documents. The AI analyzes your content and automatically generates a structured learning outline with clear pedagogical logic. It also selects the most effective resource type at each stage—games, comparisons, videos, role plays—everything in just one click.
You can adjust each step or slide and add new content quickly and easily. You can also choose your style, colors, and template, and the AI will apply your visual identity across the entire project, ensuring consistent design from start to finish.
| What to review | Why it matters | How to check |
|---|---|---|
| correct imsmanifest.xml | The LMS needs to interpret the packet | Open and validate structure |
| Completion defined | Otherwise, the LMS will not mark it as completed. | Review criteria in the tool |
| Tracking works | Without a commit, there is no data. | Test in SCORM Cloud |
| Optimized weight and resources | Avoid slow loading times and failures | Check the size of the .zip file |
| Basic accessibility | Reduce legal risk and improve UX | Keyboard, contrast, subtitles |
More and more teams are facing the same reality: it’s no longer a “nice to have.” Accessibility is becoming a growing requirement due to regulations and quality standards. The most widely used framework for validating digital content is WCAG (W3C).
In SCORM, this translates into very concrete solutions: keyboard navigation, captions, proper contrast, visible focus indicators, consistent structure, alternative text… and, above all, avoiding interactions that only work with a mouse or that lack accessible alternatives.
Creating effective and engaging SCORM content is essential to ensure a successful and enriching online learning experience. To help you achieve this, here are some best practices focused on the core characteristics of the SCORM standard:
Interoperability allows SCORM content to be used across different learning platforms without compatibility issues. To ensure interoperability:
SCORM content reusability allows learning modules to be reused in different contexts and courses. To maximize this feature:
SCORM content should maintain its relevance and functionality over time, even as technology evolves. To ensure durability:
Accessibility in e-learning is essential and regulated by standards such as Spain’s Web Accessibility Law, aligned with the European Directive 2016/2102; Section 508 of the U.S. Rehabilitation Act, which requires organizations to provide equal access to information for people with disabilities; and the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).
These regulations encourage educational institutions and organizations to ensure that their content is accessible to people with disabilities. Implementation of these standards is increasing in Spain and globally, reflecting the growing importance of delivering inclusive and equitable education. Complying with these standards is not only a legal obligation, but also enhances the learning experience by ensuring that all users can access content, participate fully, and benefit from educational opportunities.
To improve accessibility:
Finally, scalability allows you to create SCORM content that adapts to different audience sizes and course expansion. To ensure scalability:
By following these best practices, you can create SCORM content that not only meets technical standards but also delivers a rich and accessible learning experience for all users. Proper implementation of interoperability, reusability, durability, accessibility, and scalability will ensure your e-learning courses remain effective and sustainable over time.
Using intuitive authoring tools such as isEazy Author can significantly simplify the process of creating e-learning content. These tools provide ready-to-use resources that enable users—regardless of their technical background—to build engaging and effective courses in a short amount of time.
Our tool also includes customization features that allow you to adapt courses to your corporate branding, as well as productivity-enhancing capabilities such as automatic translation, voiceovers, subtitles, and final assessments—all in just a few clicks thanks to AI.
In addition, with the new AI Autopilot feature, HR teams, instructional designers, or anyone looking to create a SCORM course can transform ideas or documents into fully interactive courses with structured instructional design, applied branding, and built-in accessibility in minutes—without technical knowledge. What are you waiting for to request a demo? Discover the easiest authoring tool on the market.
SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model) is very important for standardization and interoperability in the field of e-learning. It allows for the reuse and sharing of training content between different systems and platforms, thus facilitating the distribution and monitoring of online learning.
This usually happens for one of two reasons: either the course is not correctly sending tracking values (such as completion), or the LMS is configured with a completion rule that differs from what the content is triggering. The fastest way to isolate the issue is to test the same .zip file in SCORM Cloud. If it tracks correctly there, the problem is likely in the LMS configuration; if it doesn’t, the issue is within the SCORM package itself.
The most practical option is to use SCORM Cloud, which allows you to upload the package and verify whether communication is working (completion, score, time, etc.). It’s especially useful when working with clients, multiple platforms, or LMS environments with complex configurations, because it provides a neutral validation point before deploying to production. This helps you avoid wasting time guessing whether the issue lies in the content or the LMS.
If your goal is broad compatibility with minimal risk, SCORM 1.2 is generally the safest choice. SCORM 2004 may make sense if you need advanced navigation and sequencing rules, but in practice, LMS support tends to vary more. For that reason, in corporate environments where stability is the priority, SCORM 1.2 remains the most widely used standard.
Yes, but it depends on what you mean by “create.” You can convert materials such as PowerPoint into SCORM using tools that allow simple exports, especially if the course is linear and not highly interactive. The key consideration is that “free” solutions typically work best for testing or simple content. When you need collaboration, visual consistency, ongoing maintenance, and fewer technical issues, an authoring tool usually pays off in time savings and stability.
Yes, because SCORM remains the most compatible format within the traditional LMS ecosystem and the most common in corporate training, compliance, and reporting. xAPI offers advantages when you need more granular analytics or tracking outside the LMS, but if your objective is to publish in an LMS with standardized tracking, SCORM continues to be the most straightforward and widely accepted option for most organizations.
Welcome to a new way of creating e-learning courses with AI Autopilot.
Request a demo
